12/24/2023 0 Comments Google compute vs aws pricing![]() ![]() In the cloud, you can store with the same ease anything from a bunch of GBs to several PBs (1 petabyte = 1,024 terabytes = 1,048,576 gigabytes). Google’s offering is somewhat less flexible, but the pricing is a lot easier to follow.Īlongside computing, storage is a key pillar to cloud services. Amazon’s service is the most comprehensive, but as mentioned, the pricing for EC2 can get very intricate, and the same goes for Azure’s VMs pricing. When you go on the cloud, on the other hand, you just pay for what you use and you can scale to thousands of processing nodes in a few minutes (and blow your credit card while at it, if you’re not careful).Įlastic Compute Cloud (EC2) is Amazon’s flagship for scalable computing on demand, competing with Google’s Compute Engine and Azure’s Virtual Machines and Virtual Machine Scale Sets. But you’re also paying for all of the idle time when the computers aren’t doing any actual processing, plus all of the maintenance that comes with it, which can go really high if you build a data center. Sure, if you buy the hardware you own it. If you need faster processing for graphics rendering, data analysis or what have you, you can either buy more hardware, or you can get on the cloud. ![]() This is what computers are for, after all: to calculate, to process data - to compute. Today, we live in a world in which both a huge business, and two youngsters at home with virtually no initial capital, can access world-class infrastructure for storage, computing, management and more, to make the next massive online service, and pay as they go - literally - by the hour. For everyoneīut this isn’t limited to big names. If they had to implement the physical infrastructure they actually need for their operations themselves, they’d need an army of technicians, lots of extra budget and time, and many startups would never get past these technical challenges. This allows them to better focus on doing what they’re known for, and let many of the technicalities be taken care of by an infrastructure that already exists and is constantly being upgraded. Iconic companies from both the public and the private sector - such as Netflix, Airbnb, Spotify, Expedia, PBS, and many, many more - rely on cloud services for supporting their online operations. And the way things go with Azure, it remains to be seen if that will also be the case there. While an indisputable leader in several fronts, Microsoft also has a long history of being late to the party, putting a huge amount of effort into catching up, then only to seemingly lose faith and leave things half way (such as with Zune, Groove, Mobile, Edge, and Skype). ![]() You still need a credit card to just open an account, deployments are still region-specific (no built-in CDN, seriously?), and the workflow isn’t as straightforward when compared to that of Firebase or Netlify. But Amplify is still accessed from the same old (horrifically bloated) console. It sure is a dramatic improvement from the regular AWS workflow, especially for novice users, and its documentation hub is superb and way more down-to-earth than the way Amazon usually documents services. Google really made a brilliant move with the Firebase family of products by “detaching” them from the GCP, but Amazon went half-way with AWS Amplify. (Strangely, Microsoft just seems to make a conscious effort to leave Azure outdated.)Īs I said in my article on “ 100 Jamstack Tools, APIs & Services to Power Your Sites”: Google and Amazon introduced Firebase and Amplify respectively, both wrapping a bunch of services from the GCP and AWS to present them in a clear and easy-to-implement way to web and mobile developers. But given how Netlify has simplified the game, they’ve all had to make significant additions to the way in which they present their tools to developers in order to remain competitive. (See “ Introduction to the Jamstack” and “ DevOps by Example” for more information.) All-in-one, but Simpler: Google Firebase, Netlify, AWS AmplifyĪmazon, Google, and Azure (in that order), are still pretty much the only companies that cover all of the spectrum of cloud services. Netlify also happens to be the company that coined the concept of the “Jamstack”. But it’s been a new contender that has radically simplified the deployment of cloud infrastructure and is still pushing the DevOps workflow to the next level - Netlify. In recent years, companies like DigitalOcean and Linode have made some advances on the big three. There are, of course, other cloud services we could be covering here. ![]() However, we’ll survey many of the products on offer and also get familiar with some cloud concepts. We won’t cover all of them, or get into a lot of detail about the infrastructure of cloud computing. We’ll focus on services provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and Microsoft Azure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |